Verify Revenue
Start with source records and reconcile them across a consistent period. Bank or payment-processor records, accounting exports, marketplace statements and read-only dashboards can each answer different questions. The goal is not simply to reproduce the seller’s profit number, but to understand how revenue is earned, which costs are necessary to keep earning it, and whether reported performance is repeatable.
Normalize unusual items carefully. Owner add-backs, one-time costs, discretionary expenses and recent changes can be legitimate adjustments, but every adjustment should have a reason and supporting evidence. Compare monthly trends, look for seasonality and identify revenue or cost items that changed shortly before the sale process.
Translate findings into the deal. If an important number cannot be verified, model a conservative case rather than assuming the best outcome. Material uncertainty can justify additional diligence, a different price, a holdback or another structure appropriate to the transaction.
Verify Expenses
Start with source records and reconcile them across a consistent period. Bank or payment-processor records, accounting exports, marketplace statements and read-only dashboards can each answer different questions. The goal is not simply to reproduce the seller’s profit number, but to understand how revenue is earned, which costs are necessary to keep earning it, and whether reported performance is repeatable.
Normalize unusual items carefully. Owner add-backs, one-time costs, discretionary expenses and recent changes can be legitimate adjustments, but every adjustment should have a reason and supporting evidence. Compare monthly trends, look for seasonality and identify revenue or cost items that changed shortly before the sale process.
Translate findings into the deal. If an important number cannot be verified, model a conservative case rather than assuming the best outcome. Material uncertainty can justify additional diligence, a different price, a holdback or another structure appropriate to the transaction.
Normalize Earnings
Start with source records and reconcile them across a consistent period. Bank or payment-processor records, accounting exports, marketplace statements and read-only dashboards can each answer different questions. The goal is not simply to reproduce the seller’s profit number, but to understand how revenue is earned, which costs are necessary to keep earning it, and whether reported performance is repeatable.
Normalize unusual items carefully. Owner add-backs, one-time costs, discretionary expenses and recent changes can be legitimate adjustments, but every adjustment should have a reason and supporting evidence. Compare monthly trends, look for seasonality and identify revenue or cost items that changed shortly before the sale process.
Translate findings into the deal. If an important number cannot be verified, model a conservative case rather than assuming the best outcome. Material uncertainty can justify additional diligence, a different price, a holdback or another structure appropriate to the transaction.
Test Add-Backs
Define what this step is meant to prove before collecting documents. Good diligence connects a claim to evidence, identifies what remains uncertain and asks whether the issue can materially affect future cash flow or transferability.
Compare the current state with historical patterns. One month or one screenshot rarely tells the full story. Look for trends, exceptions and dependencies, then ask the seller to explain material changes with evidence that can be independently checked where practical.
Record the conclusion and its effect on the deal. Some findings simply confirm the thesis; others change valuation, transition planning or transaction terms. The purpose is a better-informed decision, not paperwork for its own sake.
Review Seasonality
Define what this step is meant to prove before collecting documents. Good diligence connects a claim to evidence, identifies what remains uncertain and asks whether the issue can materially affect future cash flow or transferability.
Compare the current state with historical patterns. One month or one screenshot rarely tells the full story. Look for trends, exceptions and dependencies, then ask the seller to explain material changes with evidence that can be independently checked where practical.
Record the conclusion and its effect on the deal. Some findings simply confirm the thesis; others change valuation, transition planning or transaction terms. The purpose is a better-informed decision, not paperwork for its own sake.
Review Concentration
A red flag is a prompt for investigation, not automatically a reason to abandon a transaction. First determine the size of the exposure, how long it has existed, whether it is worsening and what evidence would reduce uncertainty. Concentration in a customer, supplier, traffic source, platform or owner can be manageable when it is understood and priced.
Stress-test the business with a downside case. Ask what happens to cash flow if the largest customer leaves, rankings fall, advertising costs rise, a supplier changes terms or the seller stops performing a key task. This turns a vague concern into an operating and valuation question.
Use the result to shape the transaction. Depending on the facts, a buyer may seek a lower price, transition support, representations, a holdback, seller financing or simply decide the risk sits outside the acquisition thesis. Material legal or financial risks deserve professional review.
Understand Working Capital
Define what this step is meant to prove before collecting documents. Good diligence connects a claim to evidence, identifies what remains uncertain and asks whether the issue can materially affect future cash flow or transferability.
Compare the current state with historical patterns. One month or one screenshot rarely tells the full story. Look for trends, exceptions and dependencies, then ask the seller to explain material changes with evidence that can be independently checked where practical.
Record the conclusion and its effect on the deal. Some findings simply confirm the thesis; others change valuation, transition planning or transaction terms. The purpose is a better-informed decision, not paperwork for its own sake.
Reconcile The Story
Define what this step is meant to prove before collecting documents. Good diligence connects a claim to evidence, identifies what remains uncertain and asks whether the issue can materially affect future cash flow or transferability.
Compare the current state with historical patterns. One month or one screenshot rarely tells the full story. Look for trends, exceptions and dependencies, then ask the seller to explain material changes with evidence that can be independently checked where practical.
Record the conclusion and its effect on the deal. Some findings simply confirm the thesis; others change valuation, transition planning or transaction terms. The purpose is a better-informed decision, not paperwork for its own sake.